We need your help. Repealing Senate Bill 5 will require a minimum of 231,149 signatures that must be collected to file the referendum petition. This is equal to 6% of the total vote for governor in 2010. In addition, the signatures must meet a minimum distribution requirement of 3% of the gubernatorial vote in 44 counties. And we only have 90 days.
Yes, I want to help!
What readers of JTF have known for some time, that the budget cuts proposed for K-12 education are reckless and devastating, are starting to come into stark relief in media reports around the state.
Broken Promises are what the Dispatch reports
Plunderbund, in an article worth reading in full, looks at the confusing mess of information release that has plagued this budget rollout
Except it’s a patchwork of projections that require you to examine two separate sheets on the business property tax reimbursement raid and then two other separate sheets on the utility tax reimbursement raid. You then have to take those numbers and compare them to the foundation aid projects they made last week.
The Plain Dealer went all out and produced a map of schools getting cuts
So on Wednesday the newspaper calculated the impact for other districts across Ohio. These findings can be viewed below in an interactive map and on a chart.
It's becoming obvious why the method of disseminating K-12 funding numbers is so opaque. When the true calculations are made the cuts are savage.
This leads to headlines like: Ohio gov, school districts differ on budget math, and West M levy talk postponed until July
"I just don't see how we can put a levy out there in August when we don't have the numbers," said Don Riley, a board member. "We may not be asking for enough or we may ask for too much. I agree we're going to need a levy at some point."
Quite. This is going to take some time to sort out, and the budget needs to be complete by the end of June, so expect to see lots of stories like this one - Districts learn how deep state cuts might be
“There are just too many projections out there right now,” Superintendent Rick Raach said.
[flickr photo=5490431105]The major news today, which I am sure you are all aware of was the passage of S.B.5 through both the House (on a 53-44 vote) and the Senate (a repeat 17-16) vote. The Governor is expected to sign the bill tomorrow. It will then go into effect 90 days later.
Or so they wished.
It is certain that labor groups and those who believe the middle class should remain strong will seek to place a referendum on the ballot this November. If enough signatures are collected the law will be suspended before going into effect. You can read about how this "Citizens Veto" will work here.
Coverage of yesterdays attack on the middle class can be found across all the major newspapers:
If you believe as we do that S.B.5 must be repealed, please sign up to receive our email alerts. We will be needing people to help get a repeal initiaive on the ballot and show out of touch lawmakers that working people won't just sit by and let hard earned rights be taken from us.
Some pictures from the final S.B.5 hearing in the Ohio House
[flickr set=72157626395720052]
After being voted out of committee in a 9-6 party-line vote, Republicans will advance S.B.5 to a full vote later today. The substitute bill changes can be seen here - SB5 LSC Analysis. It is expected that the Senate will concur and later this week, the bill will be signed into law by the Governor. The Plain Dealer Reports
Changes to the bill approved Tuesday include: a different process to decertify a public union; a provision to explicitly allow police and firefighters to negotiate for safety equipment; a prohibition against public workers contributing to a political action committee through a payroll deduction; and a new performance-based pay scale for teachers and other workers.
Further attacks on public education are reported by the Dispatch
The report goes on to discuss how dismantling of the teaching profession will be further pushed along in conjunction with S.B.5
It strikes references to teacher salary schedules and says that when boards cut teaching staffs they "shall consider the relative quality of performance the principal factor in determining the order of reductions." Boards may consider seniority, "but only after considering other factors," namely merit and licensing achievements.
The budget language also eliminates an opportunity for a fired teacher to seek a hearing before an impartial referee, stating instead that school boards will hear appeals and make final decisions.
Finally, it what only feels like salt in the wounds, we learn the Governor will be attending a screening of the discredited movie "Waiting for Superman" with the discredited and under investigation radical Michele Rhee
But since 2008, more than half of D.C. schools were flagged by a testing company for having unusually high rates of wrong-to-right erasures. At one school, Noyes Education Campus, the number of erasures in one class was so high that the odds of winning the Powerball grand prize were better than the erasures occurring by chance.
Stay tuned for more news throughout the day, from the Statehouse on our Twitter stream, as we bring news of the S.B.5 vote.
Guest column from Robert Barkley, Jr.
Good schools look different from one community to another. What all good schools do have in common is a series of conditions and processes which enable them to explore, grow, adapt, and learn. Just as we need to develop the capacity of students to think critically, become problem-solvers, and work collaboratively, so too do we need to develop the capacity of schools to do the same in a way that results in continuos school improvement
After years of new programs being developed to "fix" schools, we are slowly coming to understand that schools must learn to fix themselves. What they require are the tools to do so. There are many good examples of creativity, imagination, and excellence in today's public schools. The central problem is that school systems don't know how to fully support, integrate, and expand on these examples. A school is inextricably imbedded in the larger system within which it operates. The ability of that system to adapt and support improvements in individual schools can make or break positive school change.
The systemic nature of school improvement requires that anyone creating a list of the components of a good school add a strong cautionary note. We can try to create excellent schools one school at a time. By doing so we will be able to create a few additional good schools. But for the investment in these improvements to have the widest possible impact, reach the greatest number of children and be sustainable over time, we need to develop in school systems and their communities, the capacity to meet whatever challenges may arise.
The system can learn. In fact, the system must learn new roles and processes to substitute for the old traditions in school operations. The concepts listed below are achievable now in public schools without any outside formulas for miraculous change -- charters, private management, etc. However, they do require sustained support and the informed view that they require many years to build and perfect.
Robert Barkley, Jr., is a counselor in Systemic Education Reform, retired Executive Director of the Ohio Education Association, served as Interim Executive Director of the Maine Education Association, is a thirty-five year veteran of NEA and NEA affiliate staff work, long-term consultant to the KnowledgeWorks Foundation of Cincinnati, Ohio, one time teacher, coach, and local union president. He is the author of Quality in Education: A Primer for Collaborative Visionary Educational Leaders and Leadership In Education: A Handbook for School Superintendents and Teacher Union Presidents. The following components characterize good schools:
Good schools evolve by challenging outmoded traditions and engaging in systemic change. By adopting a mode of questioning old practices and developing new skills in how to plan and think strategically, these schools are concerned with continuous improvement
Good schools are characterized by shared vision and clarity and constancy of purpose. At the heart of good schools are a vision and purpose based on engaging and exciting the intellects and hearts of children.
Teachers and other school staff are viewed as the agents of constructive student-centered change. Decisions made closest to the learner stand a better chance of being educationally appropriate for the student than do those made far away from the classroom or school.
Good schools evolve through professional inquiry. In such schools many opportunities exist for regular collaboration, reflection, and planning.
Good schools empower students. Teachers serve as facilitators of learning not dispensers of knowledge, giving students substantial responsibility for their own learning.. Parents are made partners in the process of supporting student learning.
Good schools reflect respect for diversity and democracy, including diverse opinions and ideas as well as people from diverse ethnic, racial, national, and religious backgrounds.
Good schools engage in continuous data-gathering to inform and refine their goals and strategies. Staff have access to the latest educational research to inform decision making. They are skilled in doing school-based action research.
Good schools use the latest knowledge about learning, teaching, and curriculum to improve their practices. More is now known than ever before about the qualities of superior teaching, how people learn, the nature of the curriculum that will best serve youngsters in the future, and the best environments for learning. Access to and involvement in the creation of such knowledge is critical to a school's effort to renew itself continually.
Good schools have agreed upon indicators of progress and how these will be measured. These indicators are clearly communicated to non-educators such as parents and other members of the community so that they can understand student and school progress.
In good schools, school employee organizations are considered partners in change. An atmosphere of stability and greater trust is anchored in a well-balanced collective bargaining agreement.
Good schools are characterized internally by a sense of community which extends outward and involves parents and the community at large as partners in the school change effort.
Good schools are places where children are physically safe and free from fear. Adequate space and equipment and bright, clean, well-maintained facilities send a welcoming message to both students and staff and indicate that what is done there is important and valued.
In good schools, all members of the school community are viewed as learners -- from students to teachers, administrators, support personnel, parents and to other stakeholders. Further, these schools understand that professional growth is at the heart of school transformation. Learning is viewed as a continuous process and investment is made in continually expanding the capacity of staff.