Ohio charter schools: More closures, less openings signal high-water mark in 2014

Last year was pivotal for Ohio’s charter school movement — never had so many closed or so few opened.

The 2014 uptick in closures — led by 17 in Columbus — and a slump in openings — only 11 opened following 56 the year before — indicate that the groups sponsoring these publicly funded and privately run schools are rejecting some low-performers and applying heightened scrutiny before approving new ones.

As the state’s fiscal auditor and private research groups have reported inordinate amounts of misspent taxpayer dollars and low academic performance in Ohio charter schools, the slowing of the movement is in part a result of Ohio education officials cracking down on sponsors.

“Before I think we were pretty lax in what we were asking them to submit. Now we’re making sure that all those inspections are done, all the teachers are certified, all that stuff is in place before we let a school open,” a spokesman for the Ohio Department of Education has said.

Four of the 11 new charter schools, including Steel Academy in Akron, have been sponsored by the state. The remaining seven are mostly sponsored by private, nonprofit groups.

None of the 11 new charter schools has closed, though planned and actual enrollment figures reported to the state indicate at least four are operating below their enrollment goals, which determine operating revenue. Between June 2013 and June 2014, 32 Ohio charter schools closed, most voluntarily for financial reasons. Only nine had been open for more than a full academic year, signalling a spike in the failure rate of first-year schools.

A net loss of charter schools also has curbed statewide enrollment and the steadily increasing transfer of state funding from traditional public schools to charter schools.

(Read more at the Akron Beacon Journal)

Top 4 Education Stories of 2014

There were a lot of big education stories in 2014. The 5of8 fight, school shootings continuing to happen is still unacceptable, big increases in local levies due to budget cuts, disgraceful behavior by State Board of Education members, disgraceful behavior by ODE officials, 3rd grade reading guarantee comes online and Ohio's K-12 technology for implanting a lot of policy didn't. Here's our top 4 stories from 2014.

4Common Core Push Back

2014 was the year when resistance to the Common core State Standards became a mainstream phenomenon. Initially 46 states signed up to the standards, but at least 12 of them have repeal legislation pending in some form. In Ohio, the effort to push back against the CCSS began in late 2013, but bubbled all year, right into November 2014, when the Ohio House passed a bill out of committee.

No one expects repeal efforts to land on the Governor's desk in 2015, but with the Governor likely offering himself as a Presidential nominee requiring tee party votes in a primary (some of the most vocal CCSS critics), an incoming Republican legislative class packed with more extreme ideologues due to gerrymandering, and the standards themselves continuing to be burdened by poor implementation, nobody should be surprised to see this issue continue to burn.

3Corporate Education Reform Stalls Out

We saw signs in 2014 that corporate education policies were either failing, or being received by widespread skepticism. When Teach for America, beloved by the monied class, hits trouble you know there's a big shift going on. Perhaps the biggest shift has been the realization that these policies have birthed an explosion in testing that, if left unchecked, leaves scant time for actually educating students.

In Ohio, even the legislature began to wake up to the testing crisis it had helped create, by offering a bill that would reduce testing. That bill, which was far from perfect, would eventually die in the lame duck. We are almost certain to see new legislation introduced in 2015, especially when the Ohio Department of Education issues its report on the exact number of required exams, along with recommendations to potentially decrease that number. That report is due January 15th. The fact that this report will be published right at the legal deadline is a good indication it is going to cause a stir, and has not been an easy task.

The use of Standardized tests for the purposes of teacher evaluations continued to receive body blows too. At the beginning of the year, the American Statistical Association cast grave doubt on its use, and at the tail end of the year, the Board of Directors of the National Association of Secondary School Principals followed suit. Now past the point of implementation and entering the high stakes phase of these evaluation policies, we're going to see an ever increasing rise in calls for reform of the use of Value-Add, as its unfairness and unintended consequences become more and more apparent.

Nowhere was the pushback again corporate education reform more evident than in the Reynoldsburg, where teachers went on strike for 3 weeks to oppose merit pay proposals and over crowded classrooms. With huge community support behind them, the 350 teachers defeated the boards proposals and were able to return to their classrooms with a contract that would deal with class sizes, and forgo a merit pay system proven to be unsuccessful.

2The Flameout of Ed FitzGerald

Once every 4 years, voters in Ohio have an opportunity to reconsider the direction of the State's education policies when they elect a new Governor. Few could argue that Governor Kasich has done tremendous harm to public schools with his draconian budget cuts, union busting attempts and ill-thought out policies (more unwanted vouchers, more corrupt charters, 3rd grade reading laws, trigger laws no one uses, the failing Cleveland Plan, the Columbus Plan that voters rejected, and on and one). This makes the spectacular flameout of the Democratic candidate, Ed FitzGerald all the more galling.

FitzGerald wasn't defeated because of his policy positions. Voters actually preferred candidates who were pro public education as evidenced by the success of electing so many such candidates to the State Board of Education. Neither was FitzGerald defeated because the voters were enamored by the Governor and his record. It was the lowest turnout election on record, with the governor getting barely as many votes as his did in 2010. No, FitzGerald was simply a terrible candidate who ran an even worse campaign.

We considered making this our #1 story of 2014, but in the end, not even this could top our final choice.

1The Charter School Quality Crisis

2014 saw an explosion in reporting on the Ohio charter school boondoggle. A billion dollar business that continues to fail students and rip off tax payers. Charter schools in 2014 weren't any different than 2013, but the volume of reporting finally brought the desperate situation to the attention of the mainstream. Report, after report after report, throughout the year highlighted the corruption, fraud and failure of these schools. Even pro-charter school boosters got in on the act at the end of the year, producing reports showing that Ohio's charters were failing their students.

The year ended with tough talk from the Governor promising to clean up the mess. The question for 2015 will be whether the Governor can follow through on his tough talk and finally deal with this education disgrace that is harming tens of thousands of students each and every year.

The start of the New Year brings a new requirement for schools

Starting January first, Ohio schools must create a new safety plan.

Administrators have been making these plans for a few years now but the updated versions must follow new parameters laid out by the state. As John Charlton with the Ohio Department of Education explains this creates a better standard compared to previous plans.

“Certain things were included in some that were not included on others,” Charlton said. “So they were really just kind of all over the place as you can imagine with more than almost 4,000 schools in the state you had about 4,000 different variations of what those plans look like.”

Charlton says these plans help build better relationships between school administrators and safety officials in the community.

(More at WKSU News)

Ohio's charter school mess -- don't count on it being cleaned up

Ohio's charter schools are a mess. 

Here is what a study, commissioned by the pro-charter Fordham Institute, found out:

  • Of 68 statistically significant differences between charters and regular public schools, 56 show a negative charter impact with only 12 showing a positive one;
  • An average Ohio charter school student would have completed 14 fewer days of learning in reading and 36 fewer days in math.

The results are so bad that one official at the pro-charter Hoover Institution told the City Club of Cleveland, "I am actually a pro-market kind of girl, but it doesn't seem to work in a choice environment for education."

We already knew this. In the recent Ohio school report cards, charter schools received more Fs than As, Bs, and Cs combined. Over 60 percent of these schools earned Ds or Fs. (You can check all this out on Knowyourcharter.com.)

It is so bad that on Dec. 18, Gov. John Kasich pledged to get tough next year on underperforming charter schools.

I doubt it will happen.

The bottom line is that political donors will prevent any change.

Here is what is going on: The largest sector, and greatest failures, in the charter industry in Ohio are for-profit charters. Of the $920 million in public funding that goes to charter schools, $503 million went to schools managed by for-profit firms, according to an analysis by the Akron Beacon Journal

Two-thirds of this went to five, large, and very low-performing, charter companies. The biggest of these is the White Hat group, run by David Brennan. (In fact, of the 16 lowest-performing charter groups, for-profit companies run 14 of them.)

These companies give big dollars to politicians. For example, it seems that Mr. Brennan and family members have given over $4 million to Ohio Republican candidates. For this bribe, Mr. Brennan and his ilk (like Dennis Bakke of Imagine Schools that also operate, and fail, in Ohio and who also contributes heavily to pro-charter politicians) have received a charter law that allows them to conceal their finances, charge charter schools exorbitant rents for buildings they own and fail to provide an education to Ohio's kids.

(Read more at Cleveland.com)

Will tough talk turn into strong oversight of charter schools?

John Kasich promised “to fix the lack of regulation on charter schools.” The governor did so as part of an appearance before the Ohio Chamber of Commerce last week. His commitment comes none too soon, the state having expanded quickly the openings for the privately operated and publicly funded schools. Unfortunately, the expansion has not been accompanied by the necessary oversight and accountability.

The state spends roughly $900 million a year on charter schools. Imagine such a sum added to the funding of traditional public schools. Many state lawmakers, mostly the Republican variety, would apply the closest scrutiny. In the case of charter schools, they have appeared so swayed by the idea that they have neglected the task of ensuring that public dollars are well spent.

In his talk to the chamber, the governor made a curious observation, insisting that “there is no excuse for people coming in here and taking advantage of anything.” He seemed to have in mind Concept Schools, a charter operation based in Chicago with schools in Ohio that are the focus of investigators. Yet the problems are not limited to outsiders. Ohioans have tarnished the idea, in particular, White Hat and other for-profit managers of charter schools. Of the 16 lowest performing networks of charter schools in Ohio in 2013, 14 were run by such for-profit firms.

In addition, these for-profit operators receive more than half of the public money flowing to charter schools.

The governor’s comments arrived in the wake of two recent analyses. One by Stanford University found that Ohio charter students received 14 fewer days of learning in reading and 43 fewer days in math compared to those in traditional public schools. It reported that of the 26 states with charter schools, just three have a lower performance rate than Ohio.

(Read more at Ohio.com)

Another report calling for charter school accountability

The Fordham Institute commissioned Bellwether Education Partners to study Ohio's charter school law and to formulate state policy recommendations. The report-The Road to Redemption-made public December 17, provides ten policy recommendations that would correct some of the charter debacles that are embarrassing to charter advocates in Ohio and beyond.

All the persons interviewed for the study are involved in the charter school industry and/or are charter advocates.

Many of the recommendations regarding accountability have been made repeatedly by charter critics. Possibly this set of recommendations from charter apologists will attract the attention of some state officials. However, according to a December 17 article in the Akron Beacon Journal by Doug Livingston, Colleen Grady, education advisor for House Republicans, responded to the report, saying, "In all fairness, over the past three years, we've put a variety of [legislative] pieces in place." However, recent legislation has not increased accountability and transparency of charters. (Grady is a former lobbyist for White Hat Management, the company that has received $1 billion in tax dollars for its mostly failing charter schools.)

As one would expect from a study commissioned by charter advocates, the report calls for more money for charters such as:

  • State and local dollars should follow students
  • Transportation funding should be provided to charters independent from school districts
  • Facility funds from the Ohio School Facilities Commission (OSFC) should be provided to charters

Charter schools don't have a local tax-base; hence, they should not be eligible for local revenue for operations or for OSFC funds. The notion of money following the child is diametrically opposed to the constitutional provision for a thorough and efficient system of public common schools. The Constitution requires a state system. The system, not the individual, is eligible for funding.

William Phillis
Ohio E & A